Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Wilson County, North Carolina, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 99
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Wilson County, North Carolina totaled $4,808,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Lancaster Properties | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $465,774 |
2 | Scott Farms Inc | Lucama, NC 27851 | $362,634 |
3 | Rock Ridge Farm Partnership | Wilson, NC 27893 | $275,850 |
4 | Marion L Pridgen Farms Inc | Wilson, NC 27894 | $270,664 |
5 | Hocutt Farms Inc | Sims, NC 27880 | $195,445 |
6 | Webb Family Farms LLC | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $181,140 |
7 | Vick Family Farms Partnership | Wilson, NC 27896 | $178,141 |
8 | Sharp Farms Inc | Sims, NC 27880 | $160,957 |
9 | R J Hinnant & Sons Farms | Kenly, NC 27542 | $135,399 |
10 | Jeff Barnes LLC | Lucama, NC 27851 | $134,832 |
11 | Williford Sons LLC | Elm City, NC 27822 | $132,977 |
12 | Richard A Aycock Farms Inc | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $130,958 |
13 | Bass Family Farms LLC | Lucama, NC 27851 | $126,540 |
14 | David Blalock Farms LLC | Wilson, NC 27893 | $121,786 |
15 | Scott Brothers Inc | Lucama, NC 27851 | $101,314 |
16 | William A Gardner | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $99,160 |
17 | Sullivan Farms Inc | Lucama, NC 27851 | $86,633 |
18 | Agcarolina Farm Credit ** | Elizabeth City, NC 27906 | $84,443 |
19 | Batts Farms | Elm City, NC 27822 | $82,193 |
20 | Joseph Lee Gardner | Macclesfield, NC 27852 | $81,533 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>