Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Wilson County, North Carolina, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 90
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Wilson County, North Carolina totaled $903,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Lancaster Properties | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $91,321 |
2 | Agcarolina Farm Credit ** | Elizabeth City, NC 27906 | $84,444 |
3 | Vick Family Farms Partnership | Wilson, NC 27896 | $59,099 |
4 | Marion L Pridgen Farms Inc | Wilson, NC 27894 | $50,435 |
5 | Hocutt Farms Inc | Sims, NC 27880 | $29,813 |
6 | Sullivan Farms Inc | Lucama, NC 27851 | $28,878 |
7 | Webb Family Farms LLC | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $28,475 |
8 | R J Hinnant & Sons Farms | Kenly, NC 27542 | $27,277 |
9 | Sharp Farms Inc | Sims, NC 27880 | $27,079 |
10 | Bass Family Farms LLC | Lucama, NC 27851 | $24,465 |
11 | Richard A Aycock Farms Inc | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $23,491 |
12 | David Blalock Farms LLC | Wilson, NC 27893 | $23,397 |
13 | Jeff Barnes LLC | Lucama, NC 27851 | $22,601 |
14 | Williford Sons LLC | Elm City, NC 27822 | $21,326 |
15 | Agrarian Inc | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $21,139 |
16 | David Bunting & Sons Inc | Elm City, NC 27822 | $20,749 |
17 | Scott Brothers Inc | Lucama, NC 27851 | $19,167 |
18 | Pittman Brothers Farm | Wilson, NC 27893 | $16,742 |
19 | William A Gardner | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $16,331 |
20 | Joseph Lee Gardner | Macclesfield, NC 27852 | $15,269 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>