Total Commodity Programs in 2nd District of California (Rep. Jared Huffman), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 252
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 2nd District of California (Rep. Jared Huffman) totaled $7,118,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Morais Dairies | Mckinleyville, CA 95519 | $39,033 |
62 | Charca Fish II, LLC | Mill Valley, CA 94941 | $38,203 |
63 | William Nunes | Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 | $35,200 |
64 | Clint Victorine | Hydesville, CA 95547 | $31,171 |
65 | John M Estevo | Eureka, CA 95503 | $28,973 |
66 | Half Moon Bay Fisheries LLC | Kodiak, AK 99615 | $28,876 |
67 | Starbird Mariculture | Tomales, CA 94971 | $28,824 |
68 | Lisa H Zierer | Arcata, CA 95518 | $28,379 |
69 | Jesse Kuhn | Woodacre, CA 94973 | $27,818 |
70 | Charca Fish Vii, LLC | Mill Valley, CA 94941 | $27,730 |
71 | Lane Christiansen | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $27,700 |
72 | Darren R Hansen | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $26,607 |
73 | Charca Fish III, LLC | Mill Valley, CA 94941 | $26,095 |
74 | Rocky Hill Enterprise | San Rafael, CA 94915 | $25,084 |
75 | Promise LLC | Tomales, CA 94971 | $24,357 |
76 | Mrs Judith A Ferreira | Arcata, CA 95521 | $23,916 |
77 | Cory M Rocha | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $23,606 |
78 | Shane Wehr | Larkspur, CA 94939 | $23,409 |
79 | Janet Brown Dba Allstar Organics | Woodacre, CA 94973 | $22,375 |
80 | William Barboni II | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $22,220 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”