Farm Subsidy information
2nd District of California
(Rep. Jared Huffman)
Total Subsidies in 2nd District of California (Rep. Jared Huffman), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,174
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of California (Rep. Jared Huffman) totaled $86,942,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Alexandre Dairy/alexandre Eco Dairy | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $2,004,212 |
2 | Joseph Lane Russ | Eureka, CA 95503 | $1,386,742 |
3 | Renner Ranches Inc | Loleta, CA 95551 | $1,328,560 |
4 | James Walker | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $1,155,842 |
5 | Diamond R Ranch | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $1,147,983 |
6 | Miranda Dairy | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $1,126,439 |
7 | Fort Baker Ranch Co | Kneeland, CA 95549 | $1,085,793 |
8 | Albin Livestock LLC | Fortuna, CA 95540 | $976,421 |
9 | Lafranchi Ranch | Nicasio, CA 94946 | $891,337 |
10 | Alexandre Acres/sea-mist Organics | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $869,736 |
11 | Neil Mcisaac & Son Inc | Tomales, CA 94971 | $844,676 |
12 | Palmer Westbrook Inc | Smith River, CA 95567 | $776,864 |
13 | Steve Scilacci | Fortuna, CA 95540 | $776,582 |
14 | Cypress Lane Ranch | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $749,918 |
15 | Kehoe Dairy Inc | Inverness, CA 94937 | $728,798 |
16 | Frank J Leonardo | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $690,544 |
17 | Mcclure Dairy Inc | Inverness, CA 94937 | $690,316 |
18 | James M O'neil Revocable Trust - James M O'neil | Loleta, CA 95551 | $686,015 |
19 | Dennis Leonardi | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $682,484 |
20 | Spaletta Dairy | Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 | $667,708 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>