Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in 2nd District of California (Rep. Jared Huffman), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 233

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in 2nd District of California (Rep. Jared Huffman) totaled $9,501,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1
1995-2021
1Alexandre Dairy/alexandre Eco DairyCrescent City, CA 95531$379,605
2Miranda DairyFerndale, CA 95536$300,873
3Raymond F ChristieArcata, CA 95521$250,000
4The Sun Valley Group IncArcata, CA 95521$250,000
5Joseph Lane RussEureka, CA 95503$223,995
6Renner Ranches IncLoleta, CA 95551$217,428
7Mcclure Dairy IncInverness, CA 94937$203,517
8Robert Giacomini Dairy IncPoint Reyes Station, CA 94956$201,773
9James WalkerFerndale, CA 95536$179,456
10Loren PonciaNovato, CA 94949$164,958
11Lafranchi RanchNicasio, CA 94946$162,461
12Kehoe Dairy IncInverness, CA 94937$159,295
13Neil Mcisaac & Son IncTomales, CA 94971$143,201
14A.n. Hunt & Sons IncMckinleyville, CA 95519$129,819
15James M O'neil Revocable Trust - James M O'neilLoleta, CA 95551$128,462
16Clint VictorineHydesville, CA 95547$127,624
17Reservation RanchSmith River, CA 95567$127,281
18Steve ScilacciFortuna, CA 95540$124,876
19Lucas MccanlessFerndale, CA 95536$121,349
20Alexandre Acres/sea-mist OrganicsCrescent City, CA 95531$120,396

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag