Farm Subsidy information
2nd District of California
(Rep. Jared Huffman)
Total Subsidies in 2nd District of California (Rep. Jared Huffman), 2019
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 156
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of California (Rep. Jared Huffman) totaled $2,436,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | Moretti Family Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $26,007 |
| 42 | Moreda Valley Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $25,998 |
| 43 | Bianchini Inc | Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 | $25,839 |
| 44 | Bordessa Family Dairies Gp | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $25,540 |
| 45 | Riverside Dairy | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $23,868 |
| 46 | Daniel Del Biaggio | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $22,580 |
| 47 | Shane F Radelfinger | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $19,907 |
| 48 | Robert Tedsen | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $19,646 |
| 49 | Calvin C Dolcini Rvoc. Living Tr | Santa Rosa, CA 95407 | $19,539 |
| 50 | George Toste Jr | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $18,055 |
| 51 | Daniel A Collenberg | Arcata, CA 95521 | $16,655 |
| 52 | Mr Jourdan Donneley Del Biaggio | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $16,523 |
| 53 | Michael A Boynton | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $16,141 |
| 54 | Curtis L Holgersen | Loleta, CA 95551 | $15,622 |
| 55 | Wetherell Ranch Inc | Fort Dick, CA 95538 | $15,433 |
| 56 | Michael J Brazil | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $15,272 |
| 57 | Thomas Ghidinelli | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $15,181 |
| 58 | George Bianchi Inc | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $15,027 |
| 59 | Fort Baker Ranch Co | Kneeland, CA 95549 | $13,770 |
| 60 | Teresa Shinn | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $13,164 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf