SELECT * FROM cd_mtotal WHERE fips='CA02' AND progcode='total_mfp ' AND `rank`>=1 LIMIT 0,20

Total Market Facilitation Program in 2nd District of California (Rep. Jared Huffman), 1995-2020‡

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 112

Recipients of Total Market Facilitation Program from farms in 2nd District of California (Rep. Jared Huffman) totaled $2,286,000 in from 1995-2020‡.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Market Facilitation Program
1995-2020
1Alexandre Dairy/alexandre Eco Dai *Crescent City, CA 95531$95,232
2Moreda Valley Dairy *Petaluma, CA 94952$83,103
3Renati Dairy *Petaluma, CA 94952$75,257
4Mcclellands Dairy *Petaluma, CA 94952$74,044
5Spaletta Ranch *Petaluma, CA 94952$73,718
6Miranda Dairy *Ferndale, CA 95536$71,596
7Renner Ranches Inc *Loleta, CA 95551$68,150
8Ronald E Wilson Dba Diamond W DaiPetaluma, CA 94952$67,865
9Bordessa Family Dairies Gp *Valley Ford, CA 94972$54,486
10Bucher Farms Inc *Healdsburg, CA 95448$53,787
11Reservation Ranch *Smith River, CA 95567$47,830
12Lafranchi Ranch *Nicasio, CA 94946$45,579
13Debernardi Dairy Inc *Petaluma, CA 94952$44,582
14Alexandre Acres/sea-mist Organics *Crescent City, CA 95531$43,594
15Walter Stornetta Ranch *Manchester, CA 95459$42,423
16Gerald Spaletta Dairy *Petaluma, CA 94975$39,404
17James WalkerFerndale, CA 95536$35,254
18John A Mattos JrPetaluma, CA 94952$34,959
19Mccall Dairy *Petaluma, CA 94952$34,878
20Steve ScilacciFortuna, CA 95540$33,851

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

‡ Data for 2020 includes payments made by USDA through June 30, 2020 and does not include crop insurance premium subsidies.

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag