Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson), 2020

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 4,167

Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson) totaled $59,812,000 in in 2020.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC)
2020
1Idaho Agcredit Pca **American Falls, ID 83211$1,714,521
2Skyline FarmsSaint Anthony, ID 83445$583,585
3Cranney BrothersOakley, ID 83346$500,278
4Gehring Agri-businessAmerican Falls, ID 83211$495,300
5Golden Ridge FarmsJackson, ID 83350$473,924
6Bank Of Commerce **Blackfoot, ID 83221$452,800
7Kim Wahlen Farms GpAberdeen, ID 83210$448,626
8Moss Grain PartnershipRupert, ID 83350$321,196
9Farm Services Agency **Washington, DC 20250$302,254
10Koompin FarmsAmerican Falls, ID 83211$294,286
11Cache Valley Bank **Soda Springs, ID 83276$283,727
12Wtr Martin Farms PartnershipBlackfoot, ID 83221$277,019
13Vo Enterprises PartnershipPingree, ID 83262$265,666
14Driscoll BrothersPocatello, ID 83201$263,112
15Ward FarmsArbon, ID 83212$260,615
16Behrend Behrend & Knittel FarmsAberdeen, ID 83210$254,146
17Brent Lott Farms PartnershipIdaho Falls, ID 83401$249,973
18Foster Land & Cattle Brad Foster Gen PtrRirie, ID 83443$235,251
19Monty & Carolene Funk PartnershipAmerican Falls, ID 83211$235,250
20David & Magdalene SauerMonteview, ID 83435$235,249

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag