Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 4,041
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson) totaled $31,983,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Idaho Agcredit Pca ** | American Falls, ID 83211 | $1,091,243 |
| 2 | Driscoll Brothers | Pocatello, ID 83201 | $436,160 |
| 3 | Nor Vue Farms | Saint Anthony, ID 83445 | $340,071 |
| 4 | Cranney Brothers | Oakley, ID 83346 | $308,771 |
| 5 | Gehring Agri-business | American Falls, ID 83211 | $285,281 |
| 6 | Bank Of Commerce ** | Blackfoot, ID 83221 | $262,028 |
| 7 | Golden Ridge Farms | Jackson, ID 83350 | $248,946 |
| 8 | Brent Lott Farms Partnership | Idaho Falls, ID 83401 | $237,013 |
| 9 | Kim Wahlen Farms Gp | Aberdeen, ID 83210 | $217,995 |
| 10 | Monty & Carolene Funk Partnership | American Falls, ID 83211 | $184,270 |
| 11 | Lance & Lisa Funk Partnership Dba Lance Funk Farms | American Falls, ID 83211 | $182,356 |
| 12 | Skyline Farms | Saint Anthony, ID 83445 | $181,582 |
| 13 | Polatis Brothers Farms | Blackfoot, ID 83221 | $172,890 |
| 14 | Moss Grain Partnership | Rupert, ID 83350 | $168,380 |
| 15 | R & M Joint Venture | Ririe, ID 83443 | $159,214 |
| 16 | Wtr Martin Farms Partnership | Blackfoot, ID 83221 | $139,692 |
| 17 | Bj Christensen & Sons | Blackfoot, ID 83221 | $137,162 |
| 18 | David & Magdalene Sauer | Monteview, ID 83435 | $133,940 |
| 19 | Garth Vanorden Farms | Blackfoot, ID 83221 | $131,849 |
| 20 | Ward Farms | Arbon, ID 83212 | $129,936 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf