Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 2020

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 5,302

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $341,880,000 in in 2020.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
2020
1Planters Bank & Trust Company **Indianola, MS 38751$9,654,894
2First South Farm Credit Aca **Winnsboro, LA 71295$9,320,150
3Agrifund LLC **Amarillo, TX 79106$7,499,209
4Guaranty Bank & Trust Co **Belzoni, MS 39038$6,775,820
5First National Bank Of Clarksdale **Clarksdale, MS 38614$6,091,121
6The Jefferson Bank **Greenville, MS 38704$5,917,893
7Bank Of Anguilla **Anguilla, MS 38721$5,629,270
8Bank Of Commerce **Greenwood, MS 38935$4,658,933
9Southern Agricultural Credit Corp **Rolling Fork, MS 39159$3,885,029
10Bankplus **Yazoo City, MS 39194$3,725,568
11Citizens Bank & Trust Co **Marks, MS 38646$3,538,239
12Regions Bank **Grenada, MS 38901$3,437,672
13Staple Cotton Discount CorpGreenwood, MS 38935$2,763,659
14State Bank & Trust Company **Greenwood, MS 38935$2,586,526
15First Security Bank **Batesville, MS 38606$2,244,915
16Seward & Son Planting CompanyLouise, MS 39097$2,113,113
17Southern Bancorp Bank **Trumann, AR 72472$2,103,543
18New Hope FarmsSchlater, MS 38952$1,721,685
19Lakeland Planting CompanyHollandale, MS 38748$1,528,521
20St Rest Planting CoIndianola, MS 38751$1,486,738

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag