Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 2019

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,538

Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $94,754,000 in in 2019.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC)
2019
1Planters Bank & Trust Company **Indianola, MS 38751$7,309,453
2First South Farm Credit Aca **Winnsboro, LA 71295$6,578,670
3Agrifund LLC **Amarillo, TX 79106$4,412,457
4First National Bank Of Clarksdale **Clarksdale, MS 38614$4,320,413
5The Jefferson Bank **Greenville, MS 38704$3,631,412
6Guaranty Bank & Trust Co **Belzoni, MS 39038$3,281,249
7State Bank & Trust Company **Greenwood, MS 38935$2,248,988
8Bank Of Anguilla **Anguilla, MS 38721$2,102,328
9Citizens Bank & Trust Co **Marks, MS 38646$2,069,633
10Regions Bank **Grenada, MS 38901$1,978,911
11Bank Of Commerce **Greenwood, MS 38935$1,882,806
12First Security Bank **Batesville, MS 38606$1,782,034
13Southern Agricultural Credit Corp **Rolling Fork, MS 39159$1,659,428
14Southern Bancorp Bank **Trumann, AR 72472$1,257,268
15Bankplus **Yazoo City, MS 39194$1,078,500
16Staple Cotton Discount CorpGreenwood, MS 38935$1,057,902
17Seward & Son Planting CompanyLouise, MS 39097$687,160
18Steele FarmsHollandale, MS 38748$579,262
19Community Bank North Mississippi **Amory, MS 38821$578,272
20Satterfield FarmsBenoit, MS 38725$521,528

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag