Livestock Forage Disaster Program in 2nd District of Rhode Island (Rep. James Langevin), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 20
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in 2nd District of Rhode Island (Rep. James Langevin) totaled $54,556 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | A Joseph Sprague | Block Island, RI 02807 | $12,116 |
2 | David W Carpenter | Wakefield, RI 02879 | $11,463 |
3 | Panciera Farm Partnership | Ashaway, RI 02804 | $5,858 |
4 | Jeffrey Farrell | Narragansett, RI 02882 | $4,647 |
5 | Stony Hill Cattle Co, LLC | Wood River Junction, RI 02894 | $2,989 |
6 | , | $2,573 | |
7 | Trina Marsh | Ashaway, RI 02804 | $2,474 |
8 | , | $2,112 | |
9 | East Beach Oyster Company LLC | Wakefield, RI 02879 | $1,513 |
10 | Frank A Panciera | Westerly, RI 02891 | $1,290 |
11 | Diane F Whitman | Wakefield, RI 02879 | $1,101 |
12 | Paul F Bailey | East Greenwich, RI 02818 | $1,041 |
13 | Brenda S Smith | Bradford, RI 02808 | $1,041 |
14 | Henry Wright III | West Greenwich, RI 02817 | $935 |
15 | Bailey Farm Gen Partnership | East Greenwich, RI 02818 | $935 |
16 | Stephanie J Blue | Greene, RI 02827 | $902 |
17 | Brushy Brook LLC | Hope Valley, RI 02832 | $649 |
18 | Catherine S Bardsley | Exeter, RI 02822 | $392 |
19 | Cathy J Payne | Block Island, RI 02807 | $321 |
20 | Edwin Laprise | Exeter, RI 02822 | $204 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>