Total Commodity Programs in 7th District of South Carolina (Rep. Tim Rice), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 10,652

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 7th District of South Carolina (Rep. Tim Rice) totaled $301,210,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2021
21Drew FarmsMullins, SC 29574$1,858,539
22Pat And Blake Rogers FarmsBlenheim, SC 29516$1,746,873
23Francis M Hinson IIIBennettsville, SC 29512$1,746,332
24Daniel W JohnsonMullins, SC 29574$1,693,387
25Robert Smith JrDillon, SC 29536$1,684,792
26H F Price & SonsDillon, SC 29536$1,670,193
27Allen Price Sons FarmFork, SC 29543$1,634,664
28Hammond Farm 2Nichols, SC 29581$1,545,079
29Hubbard FarmsOcean Isle Beach, NC 28469$1,534,958
30Gene Robert BaxleyMarion, SC 29571$1,445,559
31Squires Brothers FarmsAynor, SC 29511$1,430,313
32Smith FarmsBennettsville, SC 29512$1,419,136
33Earl McdanielsGreen Sea, SC 29545$1,392,781
34Kenneth Long & SonsLatta, SC 29565$1,352,503
35Gregory Harold HugginsNichols, SC 29581$1,331,307
36Michael G GibsonMarion, SC 29571$1,314,276
37John Mcinnis Farms IncClio, SC 29525$1,293,397
38Jack And Walter H Price Dba Price & Price FarmsDillon, SC 29536$1,263,692
39Alan Gray BurroughsBennettsville, SC 29512$1,247,227
40M Russell WiseAynor, SC 29511$1,230,475

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag