Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Santa Clara County, California, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 96
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Santa Clara County, California totaled $3,304,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Frazier Lake Farms Inc. | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $356,252 |
2 | Eagle Fresh, Inc. | Hollister, CA 95024 | $250,000 |
3 | Al Mangini | San Jose, CA 95124 | $250,000 |
4 | Bob Kuang | San Martin, CA 95046 | $143,098 |
5 | Guo Ping Yuan | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $139,976 |
6 | Ferrara Ranches Ltd Jv | San Jose, CA 95109 | $129,505 |
7 | Jin Hao Zhou | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $122,362 |
8 | Rainforest Farms LLC | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $121,846 |
9 | An Yang Chen | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $112,743 |
10 | Zhou Ping Cai | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $103,719 |
11 | Countryside Mushrooms, Inc. | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $96,920 |
12 | Anthony Botelho | San Juan Bautista, CA 95045 | $82,170 |
13 | Rc Bar Ranch LLC | San Jose, CA 95135 | $69,015 |
14 | Mei Huan Huang | San Martin, CA 95046 | $67,836 |
15 | San Felipe Cattle Co LLC | Hollister, CA 95023 | $63,711 |
16 | Shou Xiang Li | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $56,492 |
17 | Hong Z Huang | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $46,722 |
18 | Li Hong Liang | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $41,733 |
19 | South Pacific Orchids Inc | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $40,350 |
20 | Fanny Tam | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $39,346 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>