Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Santa Clara County, California, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 96
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Santa Clara County, California totaled $3,127,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Frazier Lake Farms Inc. | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $356,252 |
| 2 | Eagle Fresh, Inc. | Hollister, CA 95024 | $250,000 |
| 3 | Al Mangini | San Jose, CA 95124 | $250,000 |
| 4 | Bob Kuang | San Martin, CA 95046 | $143,098 |
| 5 | Guo Ping Yuan | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $139,976 |
| 6 | Jin Hao Zhou | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $122,362 |
| 7 | Rainforest Farms LLC | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $121,846 |
| 8 | An Yang Chen | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $112,743 |
| 9 | Zhou Ping Cai | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $103,719 |
| 10 | Countryside Mushrooms, Inc. | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $96,920 |
| 11 | Ferrara Ranches Ltd Jv | San Jose, CA 95109 | $85,327 |
| 12 | Anthony Botelho | San Juan Bautista, CA 95045 | $82,170 |
| 13 | Mei Huan Huang | San Martin, CA 95046 | $67,836 |
| 14 | Shou Xiang Li | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $56,492 |
| 15 | Rc Bar Ranch LLC | San Jose, CA 95135 | $48,411 |
| 16 | Hong Z Huang | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $46,722 |
| 17 | Li Hong Liang | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $41,733 |
| 18 | San Felipe Cattle Co LLC | Hollister, CA 95023 | $41,093 |
| 19 | South Pacific Orchids Inc | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $40,350 |
| 20 | Fanny Tam | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $39,346 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf