Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Santa Clara County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 27
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Santa Clara County, California totaled $178,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ferrara Ranches Ltd Jv | San Jose, CA 95109 | $44,178 |
| 2 | San Felipe Cattle Co LLC | Hollister, CA 95023 | $22,618 |
| 3 | Rc Bar Ranch LLC | San Jose, CA 95135 | $20,604 |
| 4 | Twenty Four Seven Livestock LLC | Hollister, CA 95024 | $12,007 |
| 5 | Justin Fields | Coyote, CA 95013 | $10,995 |
| 6 | Leland P Belli | San Jose, CA 95127 | $9,481 |
| 7 | James Prewett | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $9,141 |
| 8 | Robert Bianchi | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $8,856 |
| 9 | Joseph Daniel Torres | San Jose, CA 95152 | $5,788 |
| 10 | Joseph A Santos | Gilroy, CA 95021 | $4,586 |
| 11 | Kirk Cattle Company LLC | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $4,149 |
| 12 | Erica Lynn Bianchi | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $3,853 |
| 13 | Russell Sanders | Livermore, CA 94550 | $3,780 |
| 14 | Clarie Telles | Farmington, CA 95230 | $3,151 |
| 15 | Mr Michael N Miller | San Jose, CA 95127 | $3,015 |
| 16 | Thomas B Chargin | San Jose, CA 95138 | $2,384 |
| 17 | Kyle Wolfe | Gilroy, CA 95020 | $2,228 |
| 18 | Pierre O Paquelier | San Jose, CA 95120 | $1,076 |
| 19 | Carrie Kevie | Mt Hamilton, CA 95140 | $894 |
| 20 | Sally Miller | Morgan Hill, CA 95037 | $836 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf