Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in 2nd District of Hawaii (Rep. Tulsi Gabbard), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 428
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in 2nd District of Hawaii (Rep. Tulsi Gabbard) totaled $9,463,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ponoholo Ranch Ltd | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $530,593 |
| 2 | Kuahiwi Contractors Inc | Naalehu, HI 96772 | $250,000 |
| 3 | Jerry Egami | Kealakekua, HI 96750 | $250,000 |
| 4 | Jurahame A Garcia Leyva - Orchidf | Kurtistown, HI 96760 | $210,135 |
| 5 | Boteilho Hawaii Enterprises Inc | Hawi, HI 96719 | $200,000 |
| 6 | Ernest Deluz | Honokaa, HI 96727 | $192,305 |
| 7 | Kahua Ranch Limited | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $175,855 |
| 8 | Kapapala Ranch | Pahala, HI 96777 | $175,334 |
| 9 | Kawamata Farms LLC | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $159,001 |
| 10 | Palani Ranch Company Inc | Holualoa, HI 96725 | $151,742 |
| 11 | American Pacific Inc Internationa | Ninole, HI 96773 | $151,319 |
| 12 | James C Sakugawa & Sons | Kula, HI 96790 | $148,261 |
| 13 | Flowers By Kona Scent Da Smallest LLC | Ocean View, HI 96737 | $144,127 |
| 14 | Walter D Andrade | Naalehu, HI 96772 | $135,345 |
| 15 | William J Sanchez | Kapaa, HI 96746 | $135,291 |
| 16 | Duane T Shimogawa | Lawai, HI 96765 | $134,273 |
| 17 | E11even Season Produce LLC | Keaau, HI 96749 | $125,978 |
| 18 | Paradise Flower Farms Inc | Kula, HI 96790 | $125,976 |
| 19 | Green Point Nurseries Inc | Hilo, HI 96720 | $121,830 |
| 20 | S C Ranch Co Inc | Paauilo, HI 96776 | $121,003 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf