Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in 2nd District of Hawaii (Rep. Tulsi Gabbard), 2020

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 423

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in 2nd District of Hawaii (Rep. Tulsi Gabbard) totaled $7,936,000 in in 2020.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1
2020
1Ponoholo Ranch LtdKamuela, HI 96743$361,228
2Jerry EgamiKealakekua, HI 96750$232,653
3Jurahame A Garcia Leyva - OrchidfKurtistown, HI 96760$210,135
4Boteilho Hawaii Enterprises IncHawi, HI 96719$200,000
5Kuahiwi Contractors IncNaalehu, HI 96772$193,969
6Kawamata Farms LLCKamuela, HI 96743$159,001
7American Pacific Inc InternationaNinole, HI 96773$151,319
8Flowers By Kona Scent Da Smallest LLCOcean View, HI 96737$144,127
9Ernest DeluzHonokaa, HI 96727$131,193
10Kapapala RanchPahala, HI 96777$127,807
11E11even Season Produce LLCKeaau, HI 96749$125,978
12Paradise Flower Farms IncKula, HI 96790$125,976
13Green Point Nurseries IncHilo, HI 96720$121,830
14Kahua Ranch LimitedKamuela, HI 96743$119,944
15Palani Ranch Company IncHolualoa, HI 96725$117,055
16James C Sakugawa & SonsKula, HI 96790$110,262
17Kailani Farms LLCKilauea, HI 96754$108,493
18S C Ranch Co IncPaauilo, HI 96776$104,244
19Agee IncNinole, HI 96773$98,681
20Walter D AndradeNaalehu, HI 96772$93,875

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag